monthly · %
Central bank policy rate
Where this figure stands, where it is expected to go, and how far that expectation has been off before. Up to 4 countries at once; whatever you choose stays in the address, so the view is the link.
Euro area's policy rate was 2.5% in September 2026, and a year out it is expected to be higher than that.
October 2026
2.5%
2.4% to 2.6%
Usually within 0.1 of the outcome at this range
September 2027
2.9%
2.5% to 3.4%
Usually within 1.2 of the outcome at this range
The ranges are not a feeling about confidence. They are how far this method has actually been off before: half of past outcomes landed inside them, and half outside. The nearer one is tighter because the near future genuinely is more knowable than the far one.
What markets are pricing in
3.3%
By September 2027 that is 0.84 pp higher than today's 2.50%, and all of it is what the bond market already prices in. At that horizon the euro area yield curve implies 3.35%.
Not a model fitted to past policy rate: it is read off prices that already exist, and it is wrong whenever the market is.
How far off it has usually been
Every method above was replayed from each of the last three years' starting points, seeing only what was known at that point, and scored against what actually happened. That is the one number worth carrying away: how far this forecast has usually landed from the truth. The table breaks it down by method for anyone who wants to see which one earned its place.
The forecast drawn above has landed within 0.10% of the outcome on average a month ahead, and within 1.23% a year ahead.
| Method | Usually off bya month ahead | Usually off bya year ahead | Its range heldit claims 50 in 100 | vs. the simple rulebelow 1.00 is better |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What markets are pricing in | 0.08% | 0.51% | 5 in 10 | 8.21 |
| Assume last year repeats | 0.08% | 1.22% | 8 in 10 | 19.76 |
| Theta | 0.08% | 1.22% | 7 in 10 | 19.77 |
| The middle of all methodsthe one drawn above | 0.10% | 1.23% | 6 in 10 | 19.92 |
| Exponential smoothing | 0.10% | 1.27% | 5 in 10 | 20.60 |
| Automatic ARIMA | 0.10% | 1.28% | 6 in 10 | 20.78 |
Where the methods disagree
A year out, the methods stop agreeing. Here is where each one lands on its own, run on the same numbers, with the range each would not be surprised by. The spread is not a flaw to be hidden and it is not a reason to discount the forecast: it is the honest size of what nobody knows yet, and it is why the chart above draws the middle of them rather than picking a favourite.
How this is measured
The stored quantity is the price index; the rate shown here is derived from it against the same month a year earlier. That direction matters: deriving the rate keeps base effects intact, where modelling the rate directly would treat them as noise.
Countries come from different providers with different publication lags, so the series do not all end in the same month. Each one is charted to its own last observation rather than trimmed to the shortest, and the source line names the provider.